Mumia Abu-Jamal's Radio Broadcasts
Higher Quality Audio files available email@example.com
Copyright 2005 Mumia Abu-Jamal/Prison Radio
"Critics and Occupations "
rec 3-17-05 Essay
3:02 Short version Critics & Occupations
3:28 long version Critics & Occupations
CRITICS & OCCUPATIONS
[Col. Writ. 3/17/05] Copyright 2005 Mumia Abu-Jamal
There is something quite surreal about the sight of George
W. Bush taking the stage, to criticize the Syrians for their
occupation of Lebanon.
What's nutty about it, is the fact that as he speaks, his
Army occupies Iraq!
I mean, what's wrong with this picture?
I have yet to hear a serious critique of Israel's occupation,
*for decades*, of Palestine from the Americans.
Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that
the occupation of Lebanese lands by Syrians is cool.
In fact, I think that it's wrong for any nation's army to
occupy another people's country.
But, Syria is a neighbor of Lebanon. It's another Arab
country. Their people share cultural and some
Doesn't that make just a tad more sense than
American occupation of Iraq? The diversity of cultural,
religious, and ethnic differences between the US and
Iraq could hardly be more pronounced.
Yet, one is cool; and another is uncool.
I don't get that.
When Lebanese nationalists protest the Syrian
presence in their country, the U.S. media goes
hog-wild, and the State Department issues tart
What happens when Palestinians demonstrate
against the brutal occupation of their lands by
Israel? (Other than the eruption of automatic
weapons fire from Israeli F-14s, and U.S.-made
tanks, that is.)
One occupation is quietly accepted; another
is vigorously denounced.
Why aren't both occupations denounced?
Is it because one occupation supports the U.S.
aim of long-term hegemony over the region
(and it's oil)?
Is it because the other occupation is by a
country that is now seen as a potential adversary
of U.S. geopolitical aims?
We have all seen war, a war on a grand scale,
leaving tens of thousands of people dead,
fought on a pretext.
Is all this noise over occupations the opening
salvo of wars to come?
According to a recent *Washington Post*
poll, a majority of Americans now feel that the
Iraqi War wasn't worth it.
That number can only grow over time.
Any occupation is an imposition upon a weaker
people, and despite the rhetoric, is rarely, if ever,
in their true, best interest. Indeed, such
occupations also lace a poison into the body
politic of the occupier.
It bleeds both the occupied and the occupying
It's time for all occupiers to go home.
Syria from southern Lebanon.
Israel from Palestine.
Turkey from Kurdistan.
And yes, the U.S. from Iraq and Afghanistan.
That's the central principle, articulated
generations ago by an American president
(and racist!) Woodrow Wilson: "No nation is
fit to sit in judgment over any other nation."
Woody, that closet imperialist, and lover
of racist propaganda films, like *The Birth
of a Nation* (1915), got that right!
Let the principle be, for our age:
*Freedom for All Occupied People!*
That covers it all.
I get that.
Copyright 2005 Mumia Abu-Jamal
For additional information and to order Mumia's new book We Want Freedom,
Check out Mumia's NEW book:
"Faith of Our Fathers: An Examination of the Spiritual Life of African and African-American People" at www.africanworld.com
The Power of Truth is Final Free Mumia!
International Concerned Family & Friends of MAJ
P.O. Box 19709
Philadelphia, PA 19143
Phone - 215-476-8812/ Fax - 215-476-6180
E-mail - AND OFFER YOUR SERVICES!
Send our brotha some LOVE and LIGHT at:
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370
WE WHO BELIEVE IN FREEDOM CAN *NOT* REST!!
Submitted by: Sis. Marpessa